PACE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
PACE
Company Information
Website:http://pacefunders.org
Employees number:7
Number of followers:6,093
NAICS:8132
Industry Type:Philanthropic Fundraising Services
Homepage:pacefunders.org
PACE Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
PACEPhilanthropic Fundraising Services
Updated:
01/04/2026
01/04/2026
748/1000
Moderate
Ba
PACE Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
PACEPhilanthropic Fundraising Services
Score locked

PACEModerate
Current Score
748Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
756
JUNE 2026
756
MAY 2026
748
APRIL 2026
748
MARCH 2026
748
FEBRUARY 2026
748
JANUARY 2026
748
DECEMBER 2025
748
NOVEMBER 2025
747
OCTOBER 2025
747
SEPTEMBER 2025
747
AUGUST 2025
747
JUNE 2021
759
Cyber Attack
16 Jun 2021 • PACE
Prominent U.S. non-profit active in policy advocacy (unnamed in article)
Chinese Cyber-Espionage Campaign Targeting U.S. Policy-Making Non-Profit (April 2025)
732
CRITICAL-27
PHI5932459110725
Chinese cyber-espionage groups (APT41, Kelp, Space Pirates) executed a sophisticated, multi-stage intrusion targeting a U.S. non-profit tied to international policy-making. The attack began with mass vulnerability scans (April 5, 2025) exploiting CVE-2022-26134 (Atlassian), CVE-2021-44228 (Log4j), and others, followed by persistent network reconnaissance (April 16) via tools like netstat and schtasks. Attackers abused legitimate utilities (MSBuild.exe, csc.exe, vetysafe.exe) for DLL sideloading, deploying malicious payloads (sbamres.dll) and establishing C2 connections. Techniques included Dcsync for credential theft, enabling privilege escalation and lateral movement. The campaign reflected high operational coordination among Chinese APTs, leveraging shared tooling (e.g., Imjpuexc) to evade detection. The breach aimed at long-term espionage, intelligence exfiltration, and strategic influence, aligning with China’s geopolitical objectives. While no explicit data theft was confirmed, the compromise of a policy-focused organization risks exposure of sensitive diplomatic communications, internal strategies, or stakeholder data—potentially undermining U.S. policy formulation and international trust. The use of system-level privileges and persistence mechanisms suggests preparation for prolonged, undetected access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for PACE ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on PACE's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with PACE ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view PACE's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?