Comparison Overview

Philadelphia Zoo

VS

MASS MoCA

Philadelphia Zoo

3400 W Girard Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.philadelphiazoo.org

The Philadelphia Zoo’s 42-acre Victorian garden is home to more than 1,300 animals, many of them rare and endangered. The Zoo, fulfilling its mission of conservation, science, education and recreation, supports and engages in conservation efforts to protect endangered species around the world. Cheetahs, hippos, giraffes and much more make the Zoo Philadelphia's leading family attraction with over 1.2 million visitors last year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 349
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MASS MoCA

1040 Mass Moca Way, North Adams, Massachusetts, 01247, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.massmoca.org/

In May 2024, MASS MoCA will celebrate its 25th anniversary under its new Director, Kristy Edmunds, not only as a contemporary art museum and performing arts venue, but also as a creative campus with a regional, national and global impact. MASS MoCA is one of the world’s liveliest centers for making and enjoying today’s most evocative art. With vast galleries and a stunning collection of indoor and outdoor performing arts venues, MASS MoCA is able to embrace all forms of art: music, sculpture, dance, film, painting, photography, theater, and new, boundary-crossing works of art that defy easy classification. From its beginnings as the major textile mill Arnold Print Works in the mid-19th century, to its days as the Sprague Electric Company in the mid-20th century, to its current iteration as a globally renowned contemporary art museum and fabrication center, the 16-acre MASS MoCA campus has a rich history of serving as the economic engine of the city of North Adams and the surrounding region. For more information about MASS MoCA, visit www.massmoca.org or follow us on Instagram at @massmoca.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-zoo.jpeg
Philadelphia Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-moca.jpeg
MASS MoCA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Philadelphia Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MASS MoCA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philadelphia Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MASS MoCA in 2025.

Incident History — Philadelphia Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philadelphia Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MASS MoCA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MASS MoCA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-zoo.jpeg
Philadelphia Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mass-moca.jpeg
MASS MoCA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Philadelphia Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MASS MoCA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MASS MoCA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Philadelphia Zoo company.

In the current year, MASS MoCA company and Philadelphia Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MASS MoCA company nor Philadelphia Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MASS MoCA company nor Philadelphia Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MASS MoCA company nor Philadelphia Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo company nor MASS MoCA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo company nor MASS MoCA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Philadelphia Zoo company employs more people globally than MASS MoCA company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Philadelphia Zoo nor MASS MoCA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References