Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PharmEng TechnologyPharmEng Technology
VS
Eli Lilly and CompanyEli Lilly and Company
PharmEng Technology

PharmEng Technology

23 Lesmill Road, Toronto, M3B 3P6, CA

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pharmeng.com
754/1000Fair

PharmEng Technology, now part of Efor Group, leader in Compliance Engineering, is a leading provider of technical services and solutions to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and healthcare industries. With over 25 years of experience, we specialize in Commissioning, Qu...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:215
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Company

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46285

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.lilly.com/
843/1000Good

We're a medicine company turning science into healing to make life better for people around the world. It all started nearly 150 years ago with a clear vision from founder Colonel Eli Lilly: "Take what you find here and make it better and better." Harnessing the power o...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:53,748
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PharmEng Technology

PharmEng Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PharmEng Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eli Lilly and Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PharmEng Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PharmEng Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eli Lilly and Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eli Lilly and Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PharmEng Technology

PharmEng Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Eli Lilly and Company

Eli Lilly and Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PharmEng Technology company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PharmEng Technology and Eli Lilly and Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PharmEng Technology and Eli Lilly and Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PharmEng Technology or Eli Lilly and Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PharmEng Technology or Eli Lilly and Company ?
Between PharmEng Technology and Eli Lilly and Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PharmEng Technology and Eli Lilly and Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8