Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PGIMPGIM
VS
Goldman SachsGoldman Sachs
PGIM

PGIM

Newark, NJ, 07102

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.PGIM.com
771/1000Fair

PGIM, the global asset management business of Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE: PRU) is built on a 150-year legacy of strength, stability, and disciplined risk management through more than 30 market cycles. Managing $1.5 trillion in assets*, PGIM offers clients deep exp...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:4,932
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

200 West Street, New York, 10282, US

Last Update: 12/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.goldmansachs.com
728/1000Moderate

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deli...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:67,001
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PGIM

PGIM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PGIM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Goldman Sachs has 292.16% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PGIM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PGIM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PGIM

PGIM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GITGOLNVI1791815573
🔒 Incident : Breach
JONGENMCDGOL1775507547
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERN1785357267

FAQ

Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PGIM company and Goldman Sachs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PGIM and Goldman Sachs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PGIM and Goldman Sachs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PGIM or Goldman Sachs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PGIM or Goldman Sachs ?
Between PGIM and Goldman Sachs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PGIM and Goldman Sachs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9