Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

P.F. Chang'sP.F. Chang's
VS
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support CenterChick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
P.F. Chang's

P.F. Chang's

8377 E Hartford Dr, #200, Scottsdale, Arizona, US, 85255

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pfchangs.com
776/1000Fair

P.F. Chang’s is a restaurant concept that honors the 2,000-year-old Asian tradition of wok cooking and believes in making food from scratch every day in every restaurant. Since inception, P.F. Chang’s chefs hand-roll dim sum, hand chop and slice all vegetables and meat...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:10,838
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

5200 Buffington Road, Atlanta, 30349, US

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
513/1000Critical

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Prog...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:92,373
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
P.F. Chang's

P.F. Chang's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for P.F. Chang's in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - P.F. Chang's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

P.F. Chang's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
P.F. Chang's

P.F. Chang's

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PFC257080425
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1785205686
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1784708960
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1784737860

FAQ

Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between P.F. Chang's company and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between P.F. Chang's and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between P.F. Chang's and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - P.F. Chang's or Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - P.F. Chang's or Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center ?
Between P.F. Chang's and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between P.F. Chang's and Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96284
SUMMARY

A malicious user can get read-access to files in the flatpak-system-helper context if a system OCI repository is configured, because the OCI code paths in the system helper follow symlinks when importing OCI images that are under the user's control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-100886
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Seetong T8108, T8108P, T8116 and T8232 4.6.1.4-build202604241011. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Debug Service. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-100885
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.4. This affects an unknown function of the file packages/Webkul/Installer/src/Http/Middleware/CanInstall.php of the component admin-config-setup API Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.5 mitigates this issue. The patch is identified as 89f2916b6a46ff91bd1999ce38158fa0de8b9490. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-100884
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.5. The impacted element is the function Storage::download of the file packages/Webkul/Admin/src/Config/acl.php of the component attachment-download Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to improper control of resource identifiers. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.6 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The identifier of the patch is 13d6988cda8d69ece45ee1890effc90a7f21cdc1. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-100883
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.5. The affected element is an unknown function of the file packages/Webkul/Admin/src/Config/acl.php. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper access controls. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.6 is sufficient to fix this issue. This patch is called a399404a388d8ad2700a01349d0d98069c8e85a4. The affected component should be upgraded.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8