Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Peugeot FrancePeugeot France
VS
Cummins Inc.Cummins Inc.
Peugeot France

Peugeot France

2-10, Boulevard de l'europe, Poissy, 78300, FR

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.peugeot.fr/
743/1000Moderate

PEUGEOT est une marque généraliste haut-de-gamme inventive, à vocation mondiale. Ses valeurs sont l’Exigence, l’Allure et l’Emotion. Présente dans plus de 160 pays au travers de 10 000 points de vente, PEUGEOT a vendu près de 1 200 000 véhicules dans le monde en 2020. E...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cummins Inc.

Cummins Inc.

500 Jackson St, Columbus, 47201, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cummins.com
813/1000Good

At Cummins, we empower everyone to grow their careers through meaningful work, building inclusive and equitable teams, coaching, development and opportunities to make a difference. Across our entire organization, you'll find engineers, developers, and technicians who ar...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:51,710
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Peugeot France

Peugeot France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cummins Inc.

Cummins Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peugeot France in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cummins Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Peugeot France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peugeot France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cummins Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cummins Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Peugeot France

Peugeot France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cummins Inc.

Cummins Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Peugeot France company and Cummins Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Peugeot France and Cummins Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Peugeot France and Cummins Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Peugeot France or Cummins Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Peugeot France or Cummins Inc. ?
Between Peugeot France and Cummins Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Peugeot France and Cummins Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2