Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Personal PayPersonal Pay
VS
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
Personal Pay

Personal Pay

N/A

Last Update: 11/11/2025

View Profile
758/1000Fair

Personal Pay es la fintech de Telecom que tiene como objetivo potenciar las finanzas de las personas y simplificar sus operaciones cotidianas. En equipo estamos construyendo una app simple de servicio de soluciones financieras, que promueve la inclusión y expande las o...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:763
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

N/A

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.psbc.com/cn/
823/1000Good

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. also known as PSBC is a commercial retail bank founded in 2007 and headquartered in Beijing. It provides basic financial services, especially to small and medium enterprises, rural[1] and low income customers. As of December 31, 20...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Personal Pay

Personal Pay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Personal Pay in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Personal Pay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Personal Pay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Personal Pay

Personal Pay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Personal Pay company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Personal Pay and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Personal Pay and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Personal Pay or Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Personal Pay or Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. ?
Between Personal Pay and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Personal Pay and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-10777
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-10775
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.4
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-22055
SUMMARY

Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-22054
SUMMARY

Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-10771
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9