Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & SlovakiaPernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia
VS
DiageoDiageo
Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

Veletržní 24, Praha 7, 170 00, CZ

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pernod-ricard.cz
772/1000Fair

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic and Pernod Ricard Slovakia currently sell and distribute more than 40 world brands of spirits and wine on the Czech and Slovak markets, including such names as Ballantine's, Jameson, Absolut, Beefeater, Havana Club, Chivas, Martell, Olmeca ,...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:71
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Diageo

Diageo

Lakeside Drive, Park Royal, London, GB, NW10 7HQ

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://diageo.com
828/1000Good

Diageo's official LinkedIn account. We're a global leader in premium drinks, across spirits and beer, a business built on the principles and foundations laid by the giants of the industry. With over 200 brands sold in 180 countries, our portfolio has remarkable breadth...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:33,458
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Diageo

Diageo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diageo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Diageo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diageo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Diageo

Diageo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia company and Diageo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia and Diageo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia and Diageo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia or Diageo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia or Diageo ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia and Diageo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pernod Ricard Czech Republic & Slovakia and Diageo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2