Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Performance Food GroupPerformance Food Group
VS
蒙牛蒙牛
Performance Food Group

Performance Food Group

12500 West Creek Parkway, None, Richmond, VA, US, 23238

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pfgc.com
743/1000Moderate

Performance Food Group is an industry leader and one of the largest food and foodservice distribution companies in North America with more than 150 locations in the U.S. and parts of Canada. Founded and headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, PFG and our family of companie...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:7,883
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
蒙牛

蒙牛

北京市 通州区 食品工业园区一区一号 蒙牛乳业(北京)有限责任公司, 通州区, 北京, CN

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mengniu.com.cn/
787/1000Fair

As China’s leading dairy manufacturer, Mengniu focuses on producing nutritional, healthy and tasty dairy products for customers worldwide. 20 years of experiences enabled Mengniu to develop a diversified product matrix, including liquid milk, ice-cream, infant formula, ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:3,049
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Performance Food Group

Performance Food Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
蒙牛

蒙牛

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Performance Food Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 蒙牛 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Performance Food Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Performance Food Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - 蒙牛 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

蒙牛 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Performance Food Group

Performance Food Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PER626072725
蒙牛

蒙牛

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Performance Food Group company and 蒙牛 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Performance Food Group and 蒙牛, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Performance Food Group and 蒙牛, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Performance Food Group or 蒙牛 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Performance Food Group or 蒙牛 ?
Between Performance Food Group and 蒙牛, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Performance Food Group and 蒙牛, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2