Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PERA-PELLENCPERA-PELLENC
VS
SulzerSulzer
PERA-PELLENC

PERA-PELLENC

N/A

Last Update: 24/03/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

PERA-PELLENC, entreprise familiale créée en 1896 et depuis 2014, filiale du Groupe PELLENC, est l’un des principaux ingénieristes-équipementiers pour le chai. Elle propose des solutions “sur-mesure” à très forte valeur ajoutée, pour toute la filière vinicole. Pera-Pelle...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:104
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sulzer

Sulzer

Neuwiesenstrasse 15, Winterthur, 8401, CH

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sulzer.com
766/1000Fair

Sulzer is a global leader in critical applications for core infrastructure and processes for large essential industries around the world. We ensure the security, quality and durability of critical goods and services by supporting energy security, natural resource manage...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,639
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PERA-PELLENC

PERA-PELLENC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sulzer

Sulzer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PERA-PELLENC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sulzer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PERA-PELLENC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PERA-PELLENC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sulzer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sulzer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PERA-PELLENC

PERA-PELLENC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sulzer

Sulzer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PERA-PELLENC company and Sulzer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PERA-PELLENC and Sulzer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PERA-PELLENC and Sulzer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PERA-PELLENC or Sulzer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PERA-PELLENC or Sulzer ?
Between PERA-PELLENC and Sulzer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PERA-PELLENC and Sulzer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3