Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Peptamen FormulasPeptamen Formulas
VS
Hospital for Special SurgeryHospital for Special Surgery
Peptamen Formulas

Peptamen Formulas

N/A

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.peptamen.com/
761/1000Fair

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hospital for Special Surgery

Hospital for Special Surgery

535 East 70th Street, New York, 10021, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hss.edu
784/1000Fair

HSS is the world’s leading academic medical center focused on musculoskeletal health. At its core is Hospital for Special Surgery, nationally ranked No. 1 in orthopedics (for the 16th consecutive year), No. 3 in rheumatology by U.S. News & World Report (2025-2026), and ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,807
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Peptamen Formulas

Peptamen Formulas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hospital for Special Surgery

Hospital for Special Surgery

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peptamen Formulas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hospital for Special Surgery in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Peptamen Formulas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peptamen Formulas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hospital for Special Surgery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hospital for Special Surgery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Peptamen Formulas

Peptamen Formulas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hospital for Special Surgery

Hospital for Special Surgery

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Peptamen Formulas company and Hospital for Special Surgery company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Peptamen Formulas and Hospital for Special Surgery, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Peptamen Formulas and Hospital for Special Surgery, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Peptamen Formulas or Hospital for Special Surgery ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Peptamen Formulas or Hospital for Special Surgery ?
Between Peptamen Formulas and Hospital for Special Surgery, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Peptamen Formulas and Hospital for Special Surgery, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2