Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PepsiCo RomâniaPepsiCo România
VS
Nestlé Nespresso SANestlé Nespresso SA
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

undefined, Bucuresti, Bucuresti, 040069, RO

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pepsico.ro/
762/1000Fair

PepsiCo este lider global în vânzarea de alimente și băuturi, cu un portofoliu care cuprinde 22 de branduri, fiecare generând peste 1 miliard de dolari anual. Brandurile noastre principale - Quaker, Tropicana, Gatorade, Frito-Lay and Pepsi-Cola - produc sute de băuturi ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:105
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Avenue de Rhodanie 40, Lausanne, CH, CH 1007

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nespresso.com
802/1000Good

Coffee is at the heart of everything we do, and consumer satisfaction is why we do it. Our story started with one simple idea: everyone should be able to make the perfect cup of coffee at home. Something we still believe today, which is why we think delivering the hig...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,727
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PepsiCo România in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé Nespresso SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PepsiCo România (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PepsiCo România cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nestlé Nespresso SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé Nespresso SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nestlé Nespresso SA

Nestlé Nespresso SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Nestlé Nespresso SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PepsiCo România and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PepsiCo România or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PepsiCo România or Nestlé Nespresso SA ?
Between PepsiCo România and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PepsiCo România and Nestlé Nespresso SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8