Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PepsiCo RomâniaPepsiCo România
VS
Coca-Cola HBCCoca-Cola HBC
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

undefined, Bucuresti, Bucuresti, 040069, RO

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pepsico.ro/
762/1000Fair

PepsiCo este lider global în vânzarea de alimente și băuturi, cu un portofoliu care cuprinde 22 de branduri, fiecare generând peste 1 miliard de dolari anual. Brandurile noastre principale - Quaker, Tropicana, Gatorade, Frito-Lay and Pepsi-Cola - produc sute de băuturi ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:105
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coca-Cola HBC

Coca-Cola HBC

Turmstrasse 30, Zug, 6300, CH

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

We bottle and sell the beverages of The Coca-Cola Company exclusively in our 29 markets and partner with other beverage businesses to also sell their brands. With over 100 brands covering eight categories – sparkling, water, juices, ready-to-drink tea, energy, plant-bas...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:21,897
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coca-Cola HBC

Coca-Cola HBC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PepsiCo România in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola HBC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PepsiCo România (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PepsiCo România cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coca-Cola HBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola HBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PepsiCo România

PepsiCo România

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coca-Cola HBC

Coca-Cola HBC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PepsiCo România company and Coca-Cola HBC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PepsiCo România and Coca-Cola HBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PepsiCo România and Coca-Cola HBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PepsiCo România or Coca-Cola HBC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PepsiCo România or Coca-Cola HBC ?
Between PepsiCo România and Coca-Cola HBC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PepsiCo România and Coca-Cola HBC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1