Comparison Overview

People's History Museum

VS

Santa Barbara Botanic Garden

People's History Museum

Left Bank, , Spinningfields, , Manchester , M3 3ER, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phm.org.uk/

People’s History Museum is the national museum of democracy, telling the story of its development in Britain: past, present, and future. Explore the radical stories of people coming together to champion ideas worth fighting for, and be empowered by the past to make a change for the future. We are all together in the fight for a fairer world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Santa Barbara Botanic Garden

1212 Mission Canyon, Santa Barbara, Ca, 93105, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://sbbotanicgarden.org/

The Santa Barbara Botanic Garden fosters the conservation of California's native plants through our gardens, scientific research, and education programs, and serves as a role model for sustainable action. Established in 1926, the Garden is one of the nation’s oldest native plant gardens and is renowned for its naturalistic landscapes. Located in the foothills of the Santa Ynez Mountains, the Garden’s 78 acres of living collections feature more than 1,200 taxa of California native plants from all regions of the state. The Garden has helped safeguard 34 highly endangered plant species, imparted the value of plant and ecological conservation to thousands of visitors, and served as a critical resource for botanists worldwide. We are accredited by the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) as a living museum, certifying we maintain the highest standards of collections management, research and educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peopleshistorymuseum.jpeg
People's History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-barbara-botanic-garden.jpeg
Santa Barbara Botanic Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
People's History Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Barbara Botanic Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for People's History Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Barbara Botanic Garden in 2026.

Incident History — People's History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

People's History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Barbara Botanic Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Barbara Botanic Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peopleshistorymuseum.jpeg
People's History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-barbara-botanic-garden.jpeg
Santa Barbara Botanic Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to People's History Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to People's History Museum company.

In the current year, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company and People's History Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company nor People's History Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company nor People's History Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company nor People's History Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither People's History Museum company nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither People's History Museum company nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Santa Barbara Botanic Garden company employs more people globally than People's History Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither People's History Museum nor Santa Barbara Botanic Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References