Comparison Overview
Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc.

Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc.
15 West 34th Street, New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
PENTAGON 2000SQL ERP Systems provides a complete, user-friendly, feature rich and fully integrated environment that supports all of an enterprise's general business and industry's specific activities - including accounting and financial reporting. Pentagon 2000 Softwar...

Avaya
350 Mount Kemble Ave, Morristown, 07960, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
At Avaya, we give our customers the freedom to take their business in the directions that benefit them most. We provide the paths for both customers and their employees where every moment big and small can drive in the moment, memorable experiences. The journey is their...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc.







Avaya






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avaya in 2026.
Incident History - Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Avaya (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avaya cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Pentagon 2000 Software, Inc.

Avaya
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.