Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pennington County, SDPennington County, SD
VS
Ministero dell'InternoMinistero dell'Interno
Pennington County, SD

Pennington County, SD

130 Kansas City St, Rapid City, 57701, US

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://pennco.org/
737/1000Moderate

The mission of Pennington County, SD is to provide quality public services, as determined by law and citizen needs, through innovative leadership and the teamwork of its people, officials and employees. Services shall be provided in a fair, respectful and professional ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

IT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Il ministero dell'Interno è una struttura complessa il cui assetto organizzativo è disciplinato dal D.L.vo n. 300/99 e dai provvedimenti attuativi. A livello centrale, si articola in uffici di diretta collaborazione con il ministro (D.P.R. n. 98/2002) e cinque dipartime...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,519
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pennington County, SD

Pennington County, SD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Pennington County, SD has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ministero dell'Interno in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pennington County, SD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pennington County, SD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ministero dell'Interno (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministero dell'Interno cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pennington County, SD

Pennington County, SD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PEN1783311828
Ministero dell'Interno

Ministero dell'Interno

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pennington County, SD company and Ministero dell'Interno company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pennington County, SD and Ministero dell'Interno, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pennington County, SD and Ministero dell'Interno, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pennington County, SD or Ministero dell'Interno ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pennington County, SD or Ministero dell'Interno ?
Between Pennington County, SD and Ministero dell'Interno, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pennington County, SD and Ministero dell'Interno, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2