Comparison Overview
Penn State University

Penn State University
201 Old Main, University Park, pa, US, 16802-1589
Last Update: 02/04/2026
There’s a reason Penn State consistently ranks among the top one percent of the world’s universities. Across 24 campuses, our nearly 88,000 students and 17,000 faculty and staff know the real measure of success goes beyond the classroom—it’s the positive impact made on ...

Virginia Commonwealth University
910 W Franklin St, Richmond, va, US, 23284-2512
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re Virginia Commonwealth University — the university FOR Virginia. You will see an incredible mix of attitudes, styles and stories. Inclusion is our heartbeat and it drives us to tackle difficult challenges others can’t or won’t. We do things differently here, be...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Penn State University







Virginia Commonwealth University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Penn State University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virginia Commonwealth University in 2026.
Incident History - Penn State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penn State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Virginia Commonwealth University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virginia Commonwealth University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Penn State University

Virginia Commonwealth University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Redis contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the 'tlsProcessPendingData()' function, which handles the TLS pending-data list if Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Redis server. Fixed in Redis 8.2.9, 8.4.6, 8.6.6, 8.8.2, and 8.10.1.
- https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/6d088c335d5c3ec49a6c28486140b498e70b7834
- https://github.com/v12-security/pocs/tree/main/redis/server_ssl
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.10/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.2/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.4/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.6/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.8/00-RELEASENOTES
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in the product photo upload in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.16.0 allows an authenticated user holding the create product permission (routine Seller role) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin. The photo validation rule classifies the file only by its content (magic bytes) and rejects only a fixed list of PHP extensions, while ProductSaveController::save() names the stored file using the client-supplied extension and copies it into the public web root. A file that begins with an image header and carries an HTML extension passes validation, is stored under public/asset/upload/product/, and is served with a text/html content type, turning the upload into first-party stored script execution.
A flaw was found in gdk-pixbuf. When loading a specially crafted JPEG image containing chunked ICC profile markers, an error during ICC profile parsing can leave stale size metadata after the profile buffer is freed. A subsequent allocation in the same decode can cause an out-of-bounds write, potentially crashing the application. To exploit this flaw, an application using gdk-pixbuf must process the malicious JPEG image. Affected version >= 2.26.4
A relative path traversal issue in the zip extraction functionality in AWS diagram-as-code (awsdac) in versions 0.10 through 0.23 can allow a third party to write arbitrary files to the local filesystem via crafted zip entry names containing path traversal sequences. This could allow the third party to perform inappropriate actions in the diagram bundle. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to the version 0.24 or later.
A weakness has been identified in RooCodeInc Roo-Code up to 3.51.1. Affected by this issue is the function ExecaTerminalProcess of the component README File Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Multiple isses were reported to the vendor beforehand. They explain, that "they all apply to Roo Code, a project we no longer support - the repository was archived a while ago, and we don't encourage anyone to use it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.