Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Penn Medicine Radiation OncologyPenn Medicine Radiation Oncology
VS
MercyMercy
Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

N/A

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mercy

Mercy

15740 South Outer Forty Road, Chesterfield, 63017 , US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mercy.net/
790/1000Fair

At Mercy, care is more than a job - it’s a calling. Every day, our caregivers bring compassion, skill and purpose to the communities we serve across Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma. Whether you're building your career at the bedside, in a clinic or supporting c...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:30,519
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercy

Mercy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mercy

Mercy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology company and Mercy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology and Mercy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology and Mercy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology or Mercy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology or Mercy ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology and Mercy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology and Mercy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1