Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pegasus AirlinesPegasus Airlines
VS
Turkish AirlinesTurkish Airlines
Pegasus Airlines

Pegasus Airlines

Aeropark Yenişehir Mah. Osmanlı Bulvarı No:11/A 34912 - Kurtköy/İstanbul Türkiye, Istanbul, 34724, TR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.flypgs.com
718/1000Moderate

Pegasus Airlines, purchased by Esas Group in January 2005, is a leading low-cost airline in Türkiye, which provides reasonably priced transportation opportunities on point-to-point basis in short and medium range routes and aims to set up a wide flight network with high...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:7,637
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Turkish Airlines

Turkish Airlines

-, Istanbul, 34149, TR

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

Turkish Airlines has soared to new heights since its first flight in 1933, becoming the airline that connects more countries than any other. Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the world-class service, comfort, and innovative travel experience we offer, designe...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:38,884
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pegasus Airlines

Pegasus Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Turkish Airlines

Turkish Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pegasus Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turkish Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pegasus Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pegasus Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Turkish Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turkish Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pegasus Airlines

Pegasus Airlines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PEG11417622
Turkish Airlines

Turkish Airlines

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pegasus Airlines company and Turkish Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pegasus Airlines and Turkish Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pegasus Airlines and Turkish Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pegasus Airlines or Turkish Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pegasus Airlines or Turkish Airlines ?
Between Pegasus Airlines and Turkish Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pegasus Airlines and Turkish Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8