Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMFPearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF
VS
BAE SystemsBAE Systems
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

667 Safeguard St Ste 100, Pearl Harbor, HI, US, 96860

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard's primary mission is to provide regional maintenance, at the depot and intermediate levels, to keep the surface ships and submarines of our nation's Navy "Fit to Fight." As Hawaii’s regional maintenance center we provide excellence in environ...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:1,611
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BAE Systems

BAE Systems

BAE Systems, London, SW1Y 5AD, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.baesystems.com
815/1000Good

At BAE Systems, we help our customers to stay a step ahead when protecting people and national security, critical infrastructure and vital information. We provide some of the world’s most advanced, technology-led defence, aerospace and security solutions and employ a sk...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:44,353
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BAE Systems

BAE Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BAE Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BAE Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAE Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BAE Systems

BAE Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF company and BAE Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF and BAE Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF and BAE Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF or BAE Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF or BAE Systems ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF and BAE Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF and BAE Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1