Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Peak RePeak Re
VS
中国人民保险 PICC中国人民保险 PICC
Peak Re

Peak Re

NO.8 AUSTIN ROAD WEST, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.peak-re.com
751/1000Fair

Peak Reinsurance Company Limited (“Peak Re” or the “Company”) is a Hong Kong-based global reinsurance company. Since commencing operations in 2012, the Company has grown steadily to rank 27th among global reinsurance groups in terms of net reinsurance premiums written. ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:146
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

清华西路28号, 海淀区, 100084, CN

Last Update: 10/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.picc.com
764/1000Fair

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Globa...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:7,623
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Peak Re

Peak Re

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peak Re in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中国人民保险 PICC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Peak Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peak Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - 中国人民保险 PICC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中国人民保险 PICC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Peak Re

Peak Re

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Peak Re company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Peak Re and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Peak Re and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Peak Re or 中国人民保险 PICC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Peak Re or 中国人民保险 PICC ?
Between Peak Re and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Peak Re and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2