Comparison Overview
Peak Design

Peak Design
2325 3rd St, Suite 410, None, San Francisco, CA, US, 94107
Last Update: 05/03/2026
Peak Design makes award-winning bags, camera accessories, and an ecosystem of rugged phone mounts. We design truly radical gear, unparalleled in thoughtfulness, and have managed to build an equally radical company in our 12+ years of doing business. We have zero outsi...

Dar
Beirut, LB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dar is one of the world’s leading consultancies, providing design, planning, engineering, sustainability consulting, digital solutions and services, project management, and facilities management for buildings, cities, transportation, civil infrastructure, water, and the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Peak Design







Dar






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Design Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Peak Design in 2026.
Incidents vs Design Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dar in 2026.
Incident History - Peak Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Peak Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dar (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Peak Design

Dar
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.