Comparison Overview
Peacock Engineering Ltd

Peacock Engineering Ltd
Peacock House, Bell Lane Office Village, Little Chalfont, Bucks, HP6 6FA, GB
Last Update: 03/12/2025
Peacock Engineering Limited Committed to being the leading Asset and Service Management Consultancy in the UK. Peacock Engineering is a leading asset management consultancy and the only Maximo consultancy to deliver an end-to-end solution combining scheduling, asset ma...

Cisco
Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 13/10/2026
Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Peacock Engineering Ltd







Cisco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Peacock Engineering Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Cisco has 3625.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Peacock Engineering Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Peacock Engineering Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Peacock Engineering Ltd

Cisco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.