Comparison Overview
The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University

The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University
1 East Mount Vernon Place, Baltimore, MD, 21202, US
Last Update: 07/12/2025
Founded in 1857 as the first conservatory in the United States, the Peabody Institute has remained a leader at the intersection of art and education. Building on a rich history of professional music training at the highest level and focused on the five pillars of excel...

Emory University
408 Administration Building, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30322
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Emory University, a top research university located in Atlanta, Georgia, is an inquiry-driven, ethically engaged and diverse community whose members work collaboratively for positive transformation in the world through courageous leadership in teaching, research, schola...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University







Emory University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Emory University in 2026.
Incident History - The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Emory University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emory University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University

Emory University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.
When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.
Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.
alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.