Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PCCW GLOBAL LimitedPCCW GLOBAL Limited
VS
TelemontTelemont
PCCW GLOBAL Limited

PCCW GLOBAL Limited

3 Gloucester Rd, Wan Chai, Hong Kong, N/A, HK

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pccwglobal.com
760/1000Fair

PCCW Global is a leading communications service provider, offering the latest mobility, voice and data solutions to multinational enterprises, telecommunications partners, cloud and application service providers. Our truly global coverage combined with local on-the-gro...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:1,505
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Telemont

Telemont

Rua Santa Fé 100, Belo Horizonte, BR

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telemont.com.br
773/1000Fair

Fundada em 1975, a Telemont Engenharia de Telecomunicações S/A é líder na prestação de serviços de implantação, manutenção e operação de redes de telecomunicações. São 7,7 milhões de acessos de voz, 3 milhões de ADSL e dados e 63 mil km de fibra óptica operados pela emp...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:10,205
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PCCW GLOBAL Limited

PCCW GLOBAL Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telemont

Telemont

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCCW GLOBAL Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telemont in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PCCW GLOBAL Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCCW GLOBAL Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telemont (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telemont cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PCCW GLOBAL Limited

PCCW GLOBAL Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Telemont

Telemont

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited company and Telemont company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited and Telemont, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited and Telemont, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PCCW GLOBAL Limited or Telemont ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PCCW GLOBAL Limited or Telemont ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited and Telemont, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PCCW GLOBAL Limited and Telemont, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8