Comparison Overview
PCA SKIN

PCA SKIN
N/A
Last Update: 07/03/2026
PCA SKIN was founded in 1990 by an aesthetician and developed by a dermatologist. Our company is grounded on three core pillars: product innovation, excellence in education and unparalleled customer support. PCA SKIN is the innovator of the modified and enhanced Jess...

Avon
Nunn Mills Road, Northampton, GB, NN1 5PA
Last Update: 16/09/2026
Think you know Avon? Think again. We’ve been doing beauty differently for 135 years. Pioneering in listening to women’s needs and speaking out for them. Standing for what matters to them. Supporting their endeavours. We’re a company that connects people through bea...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

PCA SKIN







Avon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PCA SKIN in 2026.
Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avon in 2026.
Incident History - PCA SKIN (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PCA SKIN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Avon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

PCA SKIN

Avon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.