Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PayUPayU
VS
Grupo SalinasGrupo Salinas
PayU

PayU

Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1082, NL

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://corporate.payu.com/
772/1000Fair

Global reach, local expertise: we combine the best of both worlds to reshape the future of payments and fintech to build a world of unlimited possibilities. We successfully bridge the global and local gap by supplying ultimate global payment coverage with extensive loca...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:3,386
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

MX

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gruposalinas.com
793/1000Fair

Grupo Salinas es un conjunto de empresas dinámicas, que se caracterizan por la evolución constante y la innovación, enfocadas en la creación de valor económico, social y ambiental. Estamos en industrias diversas como comercio especializado, servicios financieros, tele...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,796
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PayU

PayU

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PayU in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Salinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PayU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PayU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Salinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Salinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PayU

PayU

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PayU company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PayU and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PayU and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PayU or Grupo Salinas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PayU or Grupo Salinas ?
Between PayU and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PayU and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES