Comparison Overview

PayPal

VS

Zoho

PayPal

2211 North First Street, San Jose, CA, US, 95131
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. For support, visit the PayPal Help Center. https://payp.al/help For employment opportunities, check out our job openings in the 'Jobs' tab. We're an equal opportunity employer that welcomes diversity, and offer generous benefits to help you thrive at work and in your free time.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 34,558
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,539
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paypal.jpeg
PayPal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PayPal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zoho
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PayPal in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Zoho has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paypal.jpeg
PayPal
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Public Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Information
Motivation: Stalking, Trolling, Impersonation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PayPal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PayPal company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Zoho company.

In the current year, Zoho and PayPal have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither Zoho company nor PayPal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PayPal company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Zoho company has not reported such incidents publicly.

PayPal company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Zoho company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Zoho company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PayPal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PayPal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zoho company.

PayPal company employs more people globally than Zoho company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PayPal nor Zoho holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N