Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PAYCOMETPAYCOMET
VS
BNYBNY
PAYCOMET

PAYCOMET

Calle del Camino de Valladolid, Torrelodones, Comunidad de Madrid, 28250, ES

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.paycomet.com
753/1000Fair

PAYCOMET is an omnichannel payment platform created by payment system experts. Currently, we process over 50 billion euros annually through a network of more than 500,000 point-of-sale terminals. Our team has been innovating for over a decade to offer the best payment e...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BNY

BNY

240 Greenwich St, New York, NY, US, 10286

Last Update: 21/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bny.com
762/1000Fair

BNY is a global financial services platforms company at the heart of the world’s capital markets. For more than 240 years BNY has partnered alongside clients, using its expertise and platforms to help them operate more efficiently and accelerate growth. Today BNY serve...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:55,192
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PAYCOMET

PAYCOMET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNY

BNY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAYCOMET in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

BNY has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PAYCOMET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PAYCOMET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PAYCOMET

PAYCOMET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BNY

BNY

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BNY1776199205

FAQ

Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PAYCOMET company and BNY company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PAYCOMET and BNY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PAYCOMET and BNY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PAYCOMET or BNY ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PAYCOMET or BNY ?
Between PAYCOMET and BNY, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PAYCOMET and BNY, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9