Comparison Overview
Paycom

Paycom
7501 W Memorial Rd, Oklahoma City, 73142, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Paycom (NYSE:PAYC) automates the entire employee life cycle in a truly single HR and payroll software. The best HCM software allows employees to enter and manage their own HR and payroll data — anytime, anywhere — via desktop or our easy-to-use mobile app. With employee...

Meta
1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, 94025, US
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, In...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Paycom







Meta






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Paycom in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Meta has 880.39% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Paycom (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Paycom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Paycom

Meta
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.