Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PayactivPayactiv
VS
Old MutualOld Mutual
Payactiv

Payactiv

400 N McCarthy Blvd, Milpitas, 95035, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.payactiv.com
553/1000Very Poor

Payactiv is the best way for employees to get financial relief between paychecks, a service needed by two-thirds of the workforce. We give businesses the tools essential to ease the financial stress of their employees and build a higher performing workforce. First to r...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:389
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

107 Rivonia Rd, Johannesburg, ZA

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.oldmutual.com
766/1000Fair

Old Mutual Limited is a listed company on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and has secondary listings on the London, Malawi, Namibia and Zimbabwe stock exchanges. As a Pan-African financial services company, we are focused on Africa, her needs and her people. Together w...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,932
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Payactiv

Payactiv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Payactiv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Mutual in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Payactiv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Payactiv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Old Mutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Mutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Payactiv

Payactiv

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY2092320101425
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY3594735100225
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY1802618101425
Old Mutual

Old Mutual

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Payactiv company and Old Mutual company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Payactiv and Old Mutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Payactiv and Old Mutual, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Payactiv or Old Mutual ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Payactiv or Old Mutual ?
Between Payactiv and Old Mutual, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Payactiv and Old Mutual, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3