Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance GroupPathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group
VS
LocktonLockton
Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

1160 Dairy Ashford Rd, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://pathfinderlld.com
513/1000Critical

We go where other insurance providers cannot or will not go. That's the way Pathfinder has blazed trails for over one hundred years, and we don't plan on stopping anytime soon. We work closely with our clients and providers to develop a personalized policy that fits you...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:49
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Lockton

Lockton

Global, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lockton.com
748/1000Moderate

What makes Lockton stand apart is also what makes us better: independence. Our private ownership empowers our 13,100+ Associates doing business in over 140+ countries to focus solely on clients' risk and insurance needs. With expertise that reaches around the globe, we ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,245
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lockton

Lockton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lockton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lockton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAT1777494438
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PAT1777494552
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAT443072625
Lockton

Lockton

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOC531072525

FAQ

Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group company and Lockton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group and Lockton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group and Lockton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group or Lockton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group or Lockton ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group and Lockton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pathfinder/LL&D Insurance Group and Lockton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2