Comparison Overview

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

VS

Dancing in the Streets

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

71 East Main Street, Patchogue, NY, 11772, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (PTPA) is a nonprofit arts organization dedicated to enriching, educating, and entertaining a diverse audience through a wide range of performing artists. The theatre serves as a cultural hub for the community and the Long Island region, collaborating with local organizations and promoting educational initiatives. Originally opened in 1923 as the largest theatre in Suffolk County, Patchogue Theatre hosts 1,100 seats. Following its rescue by the Village of Patchogue in 1996 and subsequent restoration, the facility saw significant use, hosting events. PTPA operates independently as a not-for-profit organization, leasing the building from the Village of Patchogue and covering all operational costs without financial support from the Village. The theatre is overseen by a volunteer board of directors and professional staff, and its success is made possible through the dedication of numerous volunteers, businesses, funding sources, and individuals who contribute their time and resources to support the organization.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dancing in the Streets

2825 3rd Ave, Bronx , New York, 10455, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Dancing in the Streets, based in the South Bronx, develops movement-based projects through long term initiatives, integrating rigorous inquiry, artistic exploration, deep community engagement, and the nurturing of urban artists. Our three main areas of activity: Resident Artists - based in communities, to nurture individual creativity, and build bridges across generations, communities, and cultures. The Incubator - supporting and developing new generations of artists in dance and social practice. It's Showtime NYC! - nurturing emerging urban dance artists, and advocating the value, and importance of Hip Hop culture in NYC, nationally and internationally. Founded in 1984, Dancing in the Streets has produced and presented over 500 free public performances by over 300 contemporary artists, including site-specific productions at spectacular urban sites by Meredith Monk, Ann Carlson, Douglas Dunn, Eiko & Koma, Joanna Haigood, Steve Koplowitz, Tere O’Connor, Elizabeth Streb, Reggie Wilson, and Yasuko Yakoshi. In its early years, Dancing in the Streets fostered site-specific work as a public art form across New York City, the U.S. and internationally. Since 2001, Dancing in the Streets has been an urban pioneer, producing dance performances in unknown sites throughout the NYC metropolitan area, including the massive Port Authority Grain Terminal in Red Hook, the Tobacco Warehouse in Brooklyn Bridge Park, Fort Jay on Governor’s Island, Hangar B at Brooklyn’s Floyd Bennett Field, and in the streets of the South Bronx.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dancing in the Streets
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancing in the Streets in 2025.

Incident History — Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dancing in the Streets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancing in the Streets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patchogue-theatre-for-the-performing-arts.jpeg
Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dancing in the Streets company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dancing in the Streets company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company.

In the current year, Dancing in the Streets company and Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company nor Dancing in the Streets company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts company employs more people globally than Dancing in the Streets company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts nor Dancing in the Streets holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N