Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ParxlParxl
VS
Brink’s IncBrink’s Inc
Parxl

Parxl

Airline House, 25 Airline Road, Singapore, 819829 , SG

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://parxl.com
795/1000Fair

Parxl is a cross-border shipping solution developed by Singapore Airlines to leverage our global presence and deep expertise in delivering customer satisfaction with technology. When using us, your e-commerce parcels travel on one of our 900 weekly flights, right throu...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

1801 Bayberry Ct, Richmond, 23226, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.brinks.com
720/1000Moderate

The Brink’s Company (NYSE:BCO) is a leading global provider of cash and valuables management, digital retail solutions (DRS), and ATM managed services (AMS). Our customers include financial institutions, retailers, government agencies, mints, jewelers and other commerci...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:10,590
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parxl

Parxl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parxl in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

Brink’s Inc has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Parxl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parxl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brink’s Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brink’s Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parxl

Parxl

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-1785709734

FAQ

Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parxl company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parxl and Brink’s Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parxl and Brink’s Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parxl or Brink’s Inc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parxl or Brink’s Inc ?
Between Parxl and Brink’s Inc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parxl and Brink’s Inc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2