Comparison Overview
Parxl

Parxl
Airline House, 25 Airline Road, Singapore, 819829 , SG
Last Update: 25/02/2026
Parxl is a cross-border shipping solution developed by Singapore Airlines to leverage our global presence and deep expertise in delivering customer satisfaction with technology. When using us, your e-commerce parcels travel on one of our 900 weekly flights, right throu...

Brink’s Inc
1801 Bayberry Ct, Richmond, 23226, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
The Brink’s Company (NYSE:BCO) is a leading global provider of cash and valuables management, digital retail solutions (DRS), and ATM managed services (AMS). Our customers include financial institutions, retailers, government agencies, mints, jewelers and other commerci...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Parxl







Brink’s Inc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parxl in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
Brink’s Inc has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Parxl (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parxl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Brink’s Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brink’s Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Parxl

Brink’s Inc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.