Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Partesa SrlPartesa Srl
VS
The HEINEKEN CompanyThe HEINEKEN Company
Partesa Srl

Partesa Srl

Viale Edison, 110, Sesto San Giovanni, 20099, IT

Last Update: 13/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.partesa.it
766/1000Fair

Partesa è il network distributivo specializzato nei servizi di vendita, distribuzione, consulenza e formazione per il canale Ho.Re.Ca. Con oltre 25 anni d’esperienza e 40.000 clienti, Partesa vanta un ampio e attento portfolio di prodotti di qualità (10.000 referenze)...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:749
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

Tweede Weteringsplantsoen 21, 1017 ZD, Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 22/06/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

HEINEKEN - the world's most international brewer. It is the leading developer and marketer of premium beer and cider brands. Led by the Heineken® brand, the Group has a portfolio of more than 500 international, regional, local, and speciality beers and ciders. We are co...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:42,812
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Partesa Srl

Partesa Srl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Partesa Srl in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The HEINEKEN Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Partesa Srl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Partesa Srl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The HEINEKEN Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The HEINEKEN Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Partesa Srl

Partesa Srl

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The HEINEKEN Company

The HEINEKEN Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEI513080425

FAQ

Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Partesa Srl company and The HEINEKEN Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Partesa Srl and The HEINEKEN Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Partesa Srl and The HEINEKEN Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Partesa Srl or The HEINEKEN Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Partesa Srl or The HEINEKEN Company ?
Between Partesa Srl and The HEINEKEN Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Partesa Srl and The HEINEKEN Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA