Comparison Overview
Parsons Corporation

Parsons Corporation
14291 Park Meadow Dr, Chantilly, Virginia, US, 20151
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Founded in 1944, Parsons Corporation, a digitally enabled solutions provider, is focused on creating the future of the defense, intelligence, and critical infrastructure markets. From Earth to outer space, we deliver tomorrow’s solutions today. Equipped with the capabil...

Ventia
155 Miller St, Level 27, North Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2060
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Ventia provides essential services to make infrastructure work for communities in Australia and New Zealand. We pride ourselves on safe and sustainable services for our corporate and government clients across a broad range of sectors, including transport, telecommunic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Parsons Corporation







Ventia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parsons Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ventia in 2026.
Incident History - Parsons Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parsons Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ventia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ventia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Parsons Corporation

Ventia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.