Comparison Overview
Parker Hannifin | Process Control
Parker Hannifin | Process Control
6035 Parkland Blvd, Cleveland , 44124, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Providing critical flow and ultra high purity components for petrochemical, chemical processing, oil gas, power generation, water analysis, biopharmaceutical, semiconductor, & analytical equipment industries
Ingersoll Rand
525 Harbour Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, 28036, US
Last Update: 24/09/2026
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:IR), driven by an entrepreneurial spirit and ownership mindset, is dedicated to Making Life Better for our employees, customers, shareholders, and planet. Customers lean on us for exceptional performance and durability in mission-critical flow ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Parker Hannifin | Process Control
Ingersoll Rand
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | Process Control in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ingersoll Rand in 2026.
Incident History - Parker Hannifin | Process Control (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parker Hannifin | Process Control cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ingersoll Rand (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ingersoll Rand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Parker Hannifin | Process Control
Ingersoll Rand
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.