Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ParfoisParfois
VS
Lojas Renner S.A.Lojas Renner S.A.
Parfois

Parfois

Porto, Porto, undefined, 4435-429, PT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

PARFOIS is a fast growing women's accessories brand, targeting early adopters and followers of fashion trends in accessories such as jewelry, handbags, wallets, watches, sunglasses, belts ans scarves. More recently PARFOIS has also been expanding on its offer of women’s...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:3,131
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lojas Renner S.A.

Lojas Renner S.A.

Av. Joaquim Porto Villanova, 401, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, BR, 91410400

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
780/1000Fair

We are a fashion and lifestyle ecosystem connected to our customers through digital channels and more than 600 stores in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. From the beginning, everything we do is to enchant. This is how our story began, in 1965, conquering important milesto...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:30,158
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parfois

Parfois

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lojas Renner S.A.

Lojas Renner S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parfois in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lojas Renner S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Parfois (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parfois cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lojas Renner S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lojas Renner S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parfois

Parfois

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lojas Renner S.A.

Lojas Renner S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parfois company and Lojas Renner S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parfois and Lojas Renner S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parfois and Lojas Renner S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parfois or Lojas Renner S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parfois or Lojas Renner S.A. ?
Between Parfois and Lojas Renner S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parfois and Lojas Renner S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8