Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Parco Archeologico di PompeiParco Archeologico di Pompei
VS
BelastingdienstBelastingdienst
Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Via Plinio, 26, Pompei, 80045, IT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://pompeiisites.org
693/1000Weak

Il Parco Archeologico di Pompei è un Istituto del Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo dotato di autonomia speciale ed esercita le sue competenze nell’ambito della tutela, della conservazione e della fruizione pubblica. E' stato istituito con DL. ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Korte Voorhout 7, Den Haag, NL, 2500 EE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

De organisatie bestaat uit diverse onderdelen, waaronder de Belastingdienst, Douane, Toeslagen, FIOD en enkele facilitaire organisaties. Met ruim 30.000 medewerkers werken we in kantoren die verspreid zijn over het hele land. Gezamenlijk heffen, innen en controleren we ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,978
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Parco Archeologico di Pompei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parco Archeologico di Pompei in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belastingdienst in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Parco Archeologico di Pompei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parco Archeologico di Pompei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Belastingdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belastingdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAR756071625
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parco Archeologico di Pompei or Belastingdienst ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parco Archeologico di Pompei or Belastingdienst ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei and Belastingdienst, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parco Archeologico di Pompei and Belastingdienst, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5