Comparison Overview
Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Parco Archeologico di Pompei
Via Plinio, 26, Pompei, 80045, IT
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Il Parco Archeologico di Pompei è un Istituto del Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo dotato di autonomia speciale ed esercita le sue competenze nell’ambito della tutela, della conservazione e della fruizione pubblica. E' stato istituito con DL. ...

Belastingdienst
Korte Voorhout 7, Den Haag, NL, 2500 EE
Last Update: 03/04/2026
De organisatie bestaat uit diverse onderdelen, waaronder de Belastingdienst, Douane, Toeslagen, FIOD en enkele facilitaire organisaties. Met ruim 30.000 medewerkers werken we in kantoren die verspreid zijn over het hele land. Gezamenlijk heffen, innen en controleren we ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Parco Archeologico di Pompei







Belastingdienst






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parco Archeologico di Pompei in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Belastingdienst in 2026.
Incident History - Parco Archeologico di Pompei (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parco Archeologico di Pompei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Belastingdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Belastingdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Parco Archeologico di Pompei

Belastingdienst
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.