Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ParallaxParallax
VS
IBMIBM
Parallax

Parallax

64 Call Ln, Leeds, Leeds, LS1 6DT, GB

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/parall.ax
750/1000Fair

Our talented teams shape digital strategies and build new products, services and technologies to drive success. Organisations need to be innovative with digital initiatives - and we understand how challenging they can be to deliver. Our team of experts partner with you ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 09/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
331/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
13
Known data breaches
16
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parallax

Parallax

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parallax in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 1187.13% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Parallax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parallax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parallax

Parallax

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PAR1767828718
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IBM1788298895
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1786584530
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785357547

FAQ

Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parallax company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parallax and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parallax and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parallax or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parallax or IBM ?
Between Parallax and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parallax and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9