Comparison Overview
PaperCut Software

PaperCut Software
Level 1, 3 Prospect Hill Road, Melbourne, 3124, AU
Last Update: 27/08/2026
PaperCut was founded on a single question: How can we put an end to piles of wasted paper sitting in printer trays? Now, we’re joined by more than 125 million users – across all 195 countries and 85,000+ organizations – all crafting better environments one print job at ...

Sage
North Park, Newcastle upon Tyne, GB, NE13 9AA
Last Update: 14/09/2026
At Sage, we knock down barriers with information, insights, and tools to help your business flow. We provide businesses with software and services that are simple and easy to use, as we work with you to give you that feeling of confidence. Customers trust our Payroll,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

PaperCut Software







Sage






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
PaperCut Software has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sage in 2026.
Incident History - PaperCut Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PaperCut Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sage (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

PaperCut Software

Sage
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.