Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PanoraysPanorays
VS
Trimble Inc.Trimble Inc.
Panorays

Panorays

41 E 11th St, 10th Floor, New York, NY, US, 10013

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://panorays.com
678/1000Weak

Panorays is a leading provider of third-party cyber risk management solutions, helping businesses optimize their defenses for each unique third-party relationship. Trusted by the most complex supply chains in the world, Panorays provides businesses the tools to stay ahe...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:119
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Trimble Inc.

Trimble Inc.

10368 Westmoor Drive, Westminster, CO, US, 80021

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.trimble.com
786/1000Fair

Trimble is a global technology company that connects the physical and digital worlds, transforming the ways work gets done. With relentless innovation in precise positioning, modeling and data analytics, Trimble enables essential industries including construction, geosp...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,347
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Panorays

Panorays

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trimble Inc.

Trimble Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Panorays has 380.77% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trimble Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Panorays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panorays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trimble Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trimble Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Panorays

Panorays

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASO1791455987
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PANPENSHA1789352726
🔒 Incident : Breach
QUE1790051572
Trimble Inc.

Trimble Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Panorays company and Trimble Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Panorays and Trimble Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Panorays and Trimble Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Panorays or Trimble Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Panorays or Trimble Inc. ?
Between Panorays and Trimble Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Panorays and Trimble Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3