Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PanopticAIPanopticAI
VS
GrabGrab
PanopticAI

PanopticAI

Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://panoptic.ai
750/1000Fair

PanopticAI is Hong Kong's leading health technology company revolutionizing vital signs monitoring with its clinically validated remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) technology. Our award-winning Vitals SDK transforms smartphones, tablets, and computers into medical-grade...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grab

Grab

3 Media Close, Singapore, 138498, SG

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://grab.careers
807/1000Good

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creati...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:57,733
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PanopticAI

PanopticAI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grab

Grab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PanopticAI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PanopticAI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PanopticAI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PanopticAI

PanopticAI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grab

Grab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PanopticAI company and Grab company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PanopticAI and Grab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PanopticAI and Grab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PanopticAI or Grab ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PanopticAI or Grab ?
Between PanopticAI and Grab, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PanopticAI and Grab, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-100739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in mathurvishal CloudClassroom-PHP-Project up to 5dadec098bfbbf3300d60c3494db3fb95b66e7be. This impacts an unknown function of the file viewresult.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument seno results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94408
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94400
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94399
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94398
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES