Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain PAM NorgeSaint-Gobain PAM Norge
VS
VINCI ConstructionVINCI Construction
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Nils Hansens vei 13, OSLO, undefined, 0667, NO

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pamline.no
749/1000Moderate

PAM Norge leverer duktile støpejernsrør og rørdeler til norsk vannbransje, samt bygg og vannkraftinstallasjoner. Vi er en del av det franske industrikonsernet Saint-Gobain.

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:85
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VINCI Construction

VINCI Construction

1973, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Premier groupe français et acteur mondial de premier plan de la construction, VINCI Construction réunit plus de 830 entreprises et près de 69000 collaborateurs dans une centaine de pays. Ses expertises s’étendent à l’ensemble des métiers du bâtiment, du génie civil, et ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:17,443
Subsidiaries:177
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VINCI Construction

VINCI Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain PAM Norge in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VINCI Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VINCI Construction

VINCI Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and VINCI Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and VINCI Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and VINCI Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge or VINCI Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge or VINCI Construction ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and VINCI Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and VINCI Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9