Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Saint-Gobain PAM NorgeSaint-Gobain PAM Norge
VS
Bechtel CorporationBechtel Corporation
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Nils Hansens vei 13, OSLO, undefined, 0667, NO

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pamline.no
749/1000Moderate

PAM Norge leverer duktile støpejernsrør og rørdeler til norsk vannbransje, samt bygg og vannkraftinstallasjoner. Vi er en del av det franske industrikonsernet Saint-Gobain.

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:85
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bechtel.com
729/1000Moderate

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:33,902
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint-Gobain PAM Norge in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Bechtel Corporation has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Saint-Gobain PAM Norge

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge or Bechtel Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Saint-Gobain PAM Norge or Bechtel Corporation ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Saint-Gobain PAM Norge and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES