Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Palmaz VineyardsPalmaz Vineyards
VS
US FoodsUS Foods
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

4029 Hagen Rd, None, Napa, California, US, 94558-3818

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Palmaz Vineyards is a food & beverages company based out of 4029 Hagen Rd, Napa, California, United States.

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
US Foods

US Foods

9399 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 500, Rosemont, IL, US, 60018

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usfoods.com
799/1000Fair

US Foods is one of America’s great food companies and a leading foodservice distributor, partnering with approximately 300,000 restaurants and foodservice operators to help their businesses succeed. With 28,000 associates and more than 70 locations, US Foods provides ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:24,952
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Foods

US Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palmaz Vineyards in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Palmaz Vineyards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palmaz Vineyards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAL153082025
US Foods

US Foods

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and US Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and US Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and US Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Palmaz Vineyards or US Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Palmaz Vineyards or US Foods ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and US Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and US Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8