Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Palmaz VineyardsPalmaz Vineyards
VS
Compass Group USACompass Group USA
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

4029 Hagen Rd, None, Napa, California, US, 94558-3818

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Palmaz Vineyards is a food & beverages company based out of 4029 Hagen Rd, Napa, California, United States.

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Compass Group USA

Compass Group USA

2400 Yorkmont Road, Charlotte, 28217, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Compass Group is redefining the food and facility services landscape with innovation and passion through the lens of what’s next. Serving premier healthcare systems, respected educational institutions, world-renowned cultural centers, popular sporting and entertainment ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:66,176
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Compass Group USA

Compass Group USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palmaz Vineyards in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Group USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Palmaz Vineyards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palmaz Vineyards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Compass Group USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Group USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Palmaz Vineyards

Palmaz Vineyards

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAL153082025
Compass Group USA

Compass Group USA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COM237072825

FAQ

Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards company and Compass Group USA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and Compass Group USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and Compass Group USA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Palmaz Vineyards or Compass Group USA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Palmaz Vineyards or Compass Group USA ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and Compass Group USA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Palmaz Vineyards and Compass Group USA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8