Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China BranchesPorsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches
VS
Volvo CarsVolvo Cars
Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

杭州, CN

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.paig.com.cn
812/1000Good

Porsche Holding Salzburg*, the largest automotive trading company in Europe, entered China market with the first premium brand dealership opening in 2005. With its fast and sustainable development and expansion in China, PAIG(China) Automobile Investment (also known as ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:106
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Volvo Cars

Volvo Cars

Assar Gabrielssons väg, Göteborg, SE

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://volvocars.com
534/1000Critical

Everything we do starts with people. Our purpose is to provide freedom to move, in a personal, sustainable and safe way. We are committed to simplifying our customers’ lives by offering better technology solutions that improve their impact on the world and bringing the ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:31,239
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Volvo Cars

Volvo Cars

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volvo Cars in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Volvo Cars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Cars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Volvo Cars

Volvo Cars

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CON1772152083
🔒 Incident : Breach
VOL112141023

FAQ

Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches company and Volvo Cars company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches and Volvo Cars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches and Volvo Cars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches or Volvo Cars ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches or Volvo Cars ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches and Volvo Cars, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porsche Automotive Investment GmbH, China Branches and Volvo Cars, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA