Comparison Overview
PagerDuty

PagerDuty
600 Townsend Street, San Francisco, 94103, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
In an always-on world, teams trust PagerDuty to help them deliver an optimal digital experience to their customers, every time. PagerDuty is the central nervous system for a company’s digital operations. We identify issues and opportunities in real-time and bring togeth...

TOTVS
Av Braz Leme, 1000, Sao Paulo, 02511-900, BR
Last Update: 21/09/2026
Olá, somos a TOTVS! A maior empresa de tecnologia do Brasil. 🤓 Líder absoluta em sistemas e plataformas para empresas, a TOTVS possui mais de 70 mil clientes. Indo muito além do ERP, oferece tecnologia completa para digitalização dos negócios por meio de 3 unidades de...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

PagerDuty







TOTVS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PagerDuty in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TOTVS in 2026.
Incident History - PagerDuty (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PagerDuty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TOTVS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TOTVS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

PagerDuty

TOTVS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.