Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PagerDutyPagerDuty
VS
DiDiDiDi
PagerDuty

PagerDuty

600 Townsend Street, San Francisco, 94103, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pagerduty.com
702/1000Moderate

In an always-on world, teams trust PagerDuty to help them deliver an optimal digital experience to their customers, every time. PagerDuty is the central nervous system for a company’s digital operations. We identify issues and opportunities in real-time and bring togeth...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,279
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
DiDi

DiDi

-, Global, CN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.didiglobal.com
750/1000Fair

DiDi Global Inc. is a leading mobility technology platform. It offers a wide range of app-based services across Asia Pacific, Latin America, and other global markets, including ride hailing, taxi hailing, designated driving, hitch and other forms of shared mobility as w...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:30,646
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PagerDuty

PagerDuty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DiDi

DiDi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PagerDuty in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DiDi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PagerDuty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PagerDuty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DiDi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DiDi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PagerDuty

PagerDuty

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAG5523555090425
DiDi

DiDi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DID3292232091125

FAQ

Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PagerDuty company and DiDi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PagerDuty and DiDi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PagerDuty and DiDi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PagerDuty or DiDi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PagerDuty or DiDi ?
Between PagerDuty and DiDi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PagerDuty and DiDi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3